A boy from the Ansar named Ibn Sayyad grew up in Medina with a reputation that unsettled the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ enough that he went to test him directly. He hid a verse in his mind – the opening of Surah ad-Dukhan, “the Smoke” – and asked the boy what he was concealing. Ibn Sayyad answered “ad-dukh,” a fragment of the right word but not the word itself. The Prophet ﷺ told him to keep quiet, “for you cannot go beyond what has been decreed for you,” and when Umar (RA) asked permission to kill him on the spot, the Prophet ﷺ refused, saying that if the boy really was what some feared, no one could overcome him by force, and if he was not, killing him would accomplish nothing. Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim both preserve the episode, and scholars cite it as a rare case of the Prophet ﷺ personally probing a suspected kahin rather than simply condemning the practice from a distance.
Long before Islam, the Arabian peninsula had its own class of fortune-tellers, kahin, who claimed to know hidden and future things, alongside astrologers who read meaning into the movement of the stars. The Quran forecloses the claim without qualification: “Say: none in the heavens and the earth knows the unseen except Allah” (Surah an-Naml, 27:65), and repeats the point elsewhere, stating that Allah alone holds “the keys of the unseen” (Surah al-An’am, 6:59). Even the Prophet ﷺ was instructed to say he had no knowledge of the unseen beyond what Allah specifically revealed to him (Surah al-A’raf, 7:188). Anyone claiming independent knowledge of what is hidden or what will happen – a palm reader, a coffee-ground reader, an astrologer – is making a claim Islamic scholarship treats as a matter of creed, not mere caution.
Islamic teaching does not dismiss a kahin’s occasional accurate prediction as pure coincidence. Aisha (RA) narrated, in a hadith recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari, that the Prophet ﷺ explained how jinn eavesdrop on the angels in the heavens, catch a fragment of true information about events not yet public, and relay that single true word down to a kahin – who then wraps a hundred lies around it to build his reputation. It is offered as the explanation for why a fortune-teller’s claims are occasionally, famously accurate: not genuine knowledge of the unseen, but a stolen fragment padded with fabrication, a picture the Quran itself reinforces when it describes jinn being driven off by meteors as they try to eavesdrop near the heavens (Surah al-Mulk, 67:5; al-Hijr, 15:18).
Several hadith address the matter directly, and in language stronger than what might seem, on the surface, a minor social custom. Sahih Muslim has the Prophet ﷺ stating that whoever visits a fortune-teller and asks him about anything will have their prayer rejected for forty days and nights – a penalty tied to the act of asking itself, whether or not the person believed the answer. Abu Dawud records a further hadith, graded authentic by several scholars, that goes further still: whoever visits a fortune-teller or soothsayer and believes what he says has disbelieved in what was revealed to Muhammad ﷺ. That places belief in a fortune-teller’s claim in the same category as rejecting the Quran outright, because it means accepting that someone other than Allah has access to the unseen.
Scholars extend the same ruling to every modern variation of the underlying claim – horoscope columns, astrology apps, palm readers, tarot cards, psychics claiming to contact the dead or predict a future. The question scholars use is not the specific method but the claim behind it: if a practice asserts knowledge of the unseen or the future through any means besides revelation, it falls under the same ruling as the pre-Islamic kahin, whether it is packaged as science, tradition, or entertainment.
This connects directly to how black magic is meant to be treated. Someone who suspects they are affected by sihr is explicitly warned against approaching a magician, a kahin, or anyone claiming to remove magic through unclear or unexplained means, even someone insisting their method is “Islamic,” because doing so risks the very violation the Prophet ﷺ warned about. The only method Islamic scholarship endorses is ruqyah shariah – treatment through the Quran and authentic supplication addressed to Allah alone – precisely because it is the one method that attributes no knowledge of, or power over, the unseen to anyone besides Him.
Classical exegesis draws out a further detail from the account of jinn eavesdropping on the angels, one scholars use to explain why kahin practice largely faded after the Prophet’s ﷺ mission began. Surah al-Jinn has the jinn themselves reporting that they used to find places to sit and listen in the heavens, but now, since revelation began descending, find those places guarded by burning flames, so that whoever tries to listen finds a meteor lying in wait for him (72:8-9). Ibn Kathir and other classical commentators read this as an intensified guarding of the heavens tied specifically to the sending of the Quran, sharply cutting the jinn’s ability to overhear fragments of true information the way they reportedly had before. It is part of why classical scholars considered the kahin tradition already in decline by the Prophet’s ﷺ time, and treated any fortune-teller claiming genuine unseen knowledge afterward as leaning even more heavily on fabrication than the kahin of earlier centuries had.
This discussion pairs naturally with our article on Daily Azkar and Duas for Protection From Sihr, Jinn, and Evil Eye.
No Comments