A look at qadar in Islamic teaching, drawn from the Quran and authentic hadith.
The sixth and final article of Islamic faith is belief in al-qadar, divine decree – the belief that Allah has full prior knowledge of everything that will occur, has recorded it, and that nothing happens outside His will. It is also, historically, the article of faith that has generated the most theological discussion, since it raises directly the question of how human free will and moral accountability can coexist with a decree fixed in advance.
Classical scholarship, particularly in the writings of Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, breaks belief in qadar into four components a Muslim is required to affirm together. The first is Allah’s complete prior knowledge of all that will happen, drawn from verses such as Surah al-Hajj (22:70): “Do you not know that Allah knows what is in the heaven and earth?” The second is that this knowledge was recorded, referenced in the same verse, understood by scholars in light of hadith describing a Preserved Tablet, al-Lawh al-Mahfuz, on which the decree of all creation was written. The third is that nothing occurs except by Allah’s will, and the fourth is that Allah is the creator of all things, including human actions themselves, a point drawn from Surah as-Saffat (37:96): “Allah has created you and what you do.”
Mainstream Islamic theology, associated historically with scholars such as Imam Abu al-Hasan al-Ash’ari, holds these four elements alongside genuine human choice and accountability, rather than treating decree as erasing free will. The Quran repeatedly addresses people as responsible moral agents – Surah al-Kahf states, “whoever wills, let him believe; and whoever wills, let him disbelieve” (18:29) – language scholars point to as proof that a person’s choices are real and consequential, even while those choices unfold within a decree Allah already knew in full.
A hadith recorded by Abu Dawud describes the Prophet ﷺ growing visibly displeased when he found his companions arguing over qadar, reminding them that earlier nations were destroyed precisely when they began disputing this matter among themselves, and instructing them not to dispute over it further. Scholars have taken this as guidance that qadar is meant to be accepted as a matter of belief and submission, not endlessly interrogated as a philosophical puzzle to be solved through debate.
Rather than producing fatalism, classical scholarship treats correct belief in qadar as the source of two balanced attitudes: full effort in choosing and acting well, since a person is never told in advance what their decree contains, paired with acceptance and freedom from despair once an outcome has already occurred and cannot be changed. A hadith recorded in Sahih Muslim captures this balance directly: the Prophet ﷺ instructed believers to be eager for what benefits them and to seek Allah’s help, and then added, if something befalls you, do not say “if only I had done such and such,” but say instead, “Allah decreed it, and what He willed, He did” – directing striving toward the future and acceptance toward the past, rather than either extreme alone.
Classical theology developed its position on qadar partly in direct response to two opposing errors that emerged among early Muslim sects. The Jabriyyah held that human beings have no real choice at all, comparing a person’s actions to a feather blown entirely by the wind, a position mainstream scholars rejected as incompatible with the Quran’s consistent address to people as morally responsible for what they choose. The Qadariyyah, in the opposite direction, held that human beings create their own actions entirely independently of Allah’s decree, a position mainstream scholars rejected as incompatible with verses affirming that Allah is the creator of all things, including human deeds. The position that came to define mainstream Sunni theology, associated with scholars such as al-Ash’ari and later al-Tahawi in his widely studied statement of creed, deliberately sits between these two poles – affirming that human beings possess real choice, for which they are genuinely accountable, while insisting that this choice itself occurs only within, and by means of, Allah’s prior knowledge and creative power, a position scholars describe as holding two truths together without fully resolving the philosophical tension between them, precisely the kind of unresolved tension the Prophet’s ﷺ warning against excessive debate on the subject was meant to discourage picking apart further than necessary.
This discussion pairs naturally with our article on The Importance of Salah (Prayer) in Islam. Readers wanting to verify the primary sources directly can consult Sunnah.com for the full Quranic text and hadith references.
No Comments