english MCQs

English MCQs – Page 32 (Q311-320)

English MCQs

311Change into indirect speech: She said, “Do not touch the wire.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'She told me not to touch the wire' because negative imperatives, direct commands using 'do not' or 'don't', are reported using the structure 'told' + object + 'not to' + base verb, placing 'not' immediately before the infinitive marker 'to'. This mirrors the standard imperative reporting pattern but adds the negative particle in its correct position. The distractor options either fail to convert the imperative form for indirect speech or misplace 'not', both common errors in negative command narration.

312Change into indirect speech: He said, “Let us go for a walk.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'He suggested that they should go for a walk' because sentences beginning with 'Let us' expressing a proposal or suggestion are reported using the verb 'suggested' followed by 'that' plus 'should', a distinctly different pattern from ordinary imperatives reported with 'told' plus infinitive. This special 'Let us' construction signals a collective suggestion rather than a command directed at someone else, which is why it requires its own unique reporting structure. Recognizing 'Let us' as a trigger for 'suggested that...should' is a frequently tested narration nuance.

313Change into indirect speech: She said, “I bought this yesterday.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'She said that she had bought that the day before' because in addition to the tense backshifting from Simple Past 'bought' to Past Perfect 'had bought', two demonstrative and time-expression changes are also required: 'this' shifts to 'that', and 'yesterday' shifts to 'the day before'. These proximity-based word changes reflect that the reported statement is being relayed at a different time and place than the original utterance. This combination of tense, demonstrative, and time-expression shifts makes such sentences among the most comprehensive narration questions tested.

314Change into indirect speech: He said, “I am writing a letter now.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'He said that he was writing a letter then' because the Present Continuous tense 'am writing' backshifts to Past Continuous 'was writing', while the time adverb 'now' correctly changes to 'then', reflecting the shift from the original moment of speaking to the later moment of reporting. This now-to-then change is part of a broader set of time and place adverb shifts required in indirect speech, including here-to-there and today-to-that day, all reflecting the change in speaker's perspective and reporting time.

315Change into indirect speech: She said, “My father will come tomorrow.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'She said that her father would come the next day' because 'will' backshifts to 'would', the pronoun 'my' shifts to 'her' to reflect the reporting perspective, and the time expression 'tomorrow' changes to 'the next day', since the reference point for future time shifts along with the change in speaking moment. This triple transformation, modal, pronoun, and time expression, is common in narration questions involving reported promises or predictions about future events originally expressed in direct speech.

316Change into indirect speech: He said, “I must finish this today.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'He said that he had to finish that that day' because the modal 'must', when expressing a strong necessity or obligation in direct speech, is conventionally reported as 'had to' in indirect speech, alongside the required shifts of 'this' to 'that' and 'today' to 'that day'. Unlike 'can' and 'will', which shift to fixed past-tense modal forms 'could' and 'would', 'must' has no true past tense form of its own, so 'had to' is used as its closest equivalent when backshifting is required.

317Change into indirect speech: He said, “Alas! I have failed.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'He exclaimed with sorrow that he had failed' because interjections like 'Alas!' expressing strong emotion are removed in indirect speech and replaced by describing the emotion directly through the reporting verb, typically 'exclaimed with sorrow', 'exclaimed with joy', or similar phrases matching the specific feeling expressed. The tense also backshifts from Present Perfect 'have failed' to Past Perfect 'had failed'. Recognizing which emotion word corresponds to which interjection, 'Alas' signaling sorrow, 'Hurrah' signaling joy, is essential for correctly narrating exclamatory sentences.

318Change into indirect speech: She said, “What a beautiful flower it is!”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'She exclaimed that it was a very beautiful flower' because exclamatory sentences beginning with 'What a...' or 'How...' are reported using 'exclaimed that', with the exclamatory structure dismantled into an ordinary statement and an intensifying word like 'very' inserted to preserve the original emphasis. The tense also backshifts from 'is' to 'was'. This transformation from an inverted exclamatory structure into a standard declarative sentence, while retaining the emotional intensity through 'very', is a distinctly tested narration pattern.

319Change into indirect speech: He said to me, “Will you help me?”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'He asked me if I would help him' because reporting a yes/no question, one without a question word like 'what' or 'where', requires inserting 'if' or 'whether' to introduce the reported clause, restoring normal statement word order, and backshifting 'will' to 'would'. This differs from wh-questions, which use the original question word itself rather than inserting 'if' or 'whether'. Distinguishing between these two question types, wh-questions and yes/no questions, and applying the correct introductory word is a core narration skill.

320Change into indirect speech: She said, “I shall never forget your kindness.”
Explanation

The correct answer is 'She said that she would never forget my kindness' because the modal 'shall' backshifts to 'would' just as 'will' does, and the pronoun 'your', originally referring to the person being spoken to, shifts to 'my' from the perspective of whoever is now reporting the statement, here presumably the original listener speaking about themselves. This pronoun shift depends entirely on who is doing the reporting, making it one of the more context-sensitive and carefully tested aspects of indirect speech pronoun transformation.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments

No comments to show.