University and college campuses in Pakistan didn’t become armed and violent by accident. The pattern traces back to a specific political decision, made deliberately by more than one party, to treat students as a resource worth organizing and arming for entirely non-academic ends.
How Students Became a Political Weapon
Both Jamaat-e-Islami and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s Pakistan Peoples Party used student politics to advance their own political goals. It was the movement against Ayub Khan that first planted the idea firmly in political minds: student activism could be organized and directed for a party’s own purposes, not just tolerated as youthful idealism on the sidelines. Political parties responded by building their own student wings, and didn’t stop at organizing them – they armed them, and funded them generously. Those organizations spread across every university and college in the country.
When the Administration Lost Control
Within those campuses, the student wings grew powerful enough that university vice-chancellors and college principals eventually found themselves unable to make a single meaningful decision without those organizations’ consent. Effective authority over campus life had passed from the institutions themselves to the armed political factions operating inside them.
Once established at that level of power, these organizations increasingly took on the character of patrons for outright criminal activity, and some effectively formed their own mafia-style syndicates on campus. Armed clashes between rival factions followed, with real casualties: between January 1990 and August 1991 alone, 580 armed incidents involving students were recorded, with 73 people killed in Punjab in that period alone.
A Generation Chasing the Wrong Ladder
Part of what makes this such a serious blow to the state of education is what it did to students’ own ambitions. Instead of directing their energy toward academic achievement, many students redirected it toward finding a path upward through exactly these criminal-linked organizations – correctly calculating that patronage from an armed student faction could open doors that grades never would.
The clearest evidence of how far that calculation paid off: several political parties came to include student leaders in their ranks against whom multiple murder cases had been formally registered – and in every one of those cases, the leader’s political standing was enough to keep the university administration from ever being able to lay a hand on him. The murder charges stayed on paper. The political career, and the campus power that came with it, continued uninterrupted.
No Comments